Article 370 was a “right loss”, through which people of J&K gained a lot, Tushar Mehta on Day 11 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 28, 2023
“Constitutions of India and J&K speak to each other through the tradition of Article 370,” Gopal Subramanium on Day 4 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 9, 2023
Article 370 was temporary only from the perspective of J&K, not India, Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 17, 2023
“Though the Constitution is a political document, its provisions cannot be manipulated for political ends,” argues Kapil Sibal of Day 3 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 8, 2023
J&K: Government Issues Tougher Rules to Constrict Government EmployeesAnees Zargar·September 18, 2021
Why is the government acquiring land under a repealed statute in Jammu & Kashmir?Raja Muzaffar Bhat·October 6, 2021
How Maulana Hasrat Mohani summed up the first ten days of hearings In Re Article 370Arif Ayaz Parrey·August 24, 2023
Justice Kaul calls for TRC in Kashmir, but look at the fate of those whose work can enable itNayeem Rather and Saranga Ugalmugle·January 26, 2024
Land-owners along Srinagar Ring Road demand post-Article 370 compensation, SC issues notice to J&K governmentRaja Muzaffar Bhat·September 13, 2023
Is appearing in a court of law against state interest? It might be if you are a Kashmiri, as petitioner-in-person Zahoor Ahmad Bhat found outGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 3, 2023
Article 370 hearings: Did the power to abrogate Article 370 come to an end in 1957?Gursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 2, 2023
Is the Blanket-Ban on Internet Restrictions an Inessential Order in Jammu & KashmirAnushree Rai and Pravah Ranka·October 17, 2020