Every right defended is the rights discourse extended; every right not defended is allowing tyranny to spread — Amina S.Arif Ayaz Parrey·March 8, 2023
Fluttering veils and flags, and the direction of the windDr. Sana Aziz and Dr. P.K. Yasser Arafath·March 8, 2023
Headscarf issue should be evaluated in context of basic human rights and not justified from theological perspective — Seyma AkinArif Ayaz Parrey·March 8, 2023
Karnataka hijab ban: No interim relief for Muslim girl students with exams due in five daysGursimran Kaur Bakshi·March 3, 2023
Karnataka hijab ban: Plea for interim directions mentioned again, Supreme Court to take a call on its listingGursimran Kaur Bakshi·February 22, 2023
Karnataka hijab ban: Supreme Court agrees to consider listing plea for interim directionsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·January 23, 2023
Both Iran’s hijab law and Karnataka ban oppress Muslim womenIsha Sharma and Anaida Khan·December 1, 2022
Supreme Court’s split verdict on hijab: Discipline, individual right and democratic politicsDr. Ayaz Ahmad and Dr. Nachiketa Mittal·October 28, 2022
Hijab ban: Supreme Court delivers split verdict, refers matter to larger benchGursimran Kaur Bakshi·October 13, 2022
Ten takeaways from petitioners’ responses, as Supreme Court concludes hearing on hijab banGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 22, 2022
Hijab not part of fundamental right to freedom of expression: Respondents before the Supreme CourtThe Leaflet·September 21, 2022
Hijab ban: Can we decide without going into the Essential Religious Practice doctrine, asks Supreme CourtGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 20, 2022
Hijab ban: To what extent Constituent Assembly Debates can be a guide, asks Supreme CourtGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 19, 2022
Hijab ban: Concept of ‘qualified public space’ is contrary to Article 19, Supreme Court toldGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 15, 2022
