The court had earlier asked the litigants to file schedules of presenting their arguments. The judgement in country’s most politically charged dispute is expected to be delivered by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, who is due to retire on November 17 this year.
The apex court on Tuesday held in a judgment that Non-governmental organisations “substantially” financed by the government fall within the ambit of the Right to Information Act
The plea filed by advocate Gaurav Bansal claimed the Central Pollution Control Board and Delhi Pollution Control Committee have unequivocally said that odd-even policy, which was implemented in 2016, has failed to curb air pollution in the national capital region.
On Monday, the Ayodhya mediation panel moved the apex court, saying the stakeholders in the panel demanded that negotiations be resumed. The panel has clarified that the parties are not seeking to stop the court proceedings.
The top court on Monday issued notice to the Centre on Tamil Nadu politician and MDMK chief Vaiko's habeas corpus petition on detained former Jammu and Kashmir Cheif minister, Farooq Abdullah, post the abrogation of Article 370.
Besides the apex court, he held “faulty” implementation of the demonetisation policy partly responsible for the downswing.
On Friday, the apex court referred to its three-judge bench the Centre’s plea seeking review of the March 20, 2018 verdict which had virtually diluted provisions of arrest under the SC/ST Act.
A day after a 23-year-old techie was killed in Chennai when a hoarding fell on her two-wheeler, the court said on Friday it was tired of passing orders prohibiting use of hoardings and banners by the roads and pavements.
The apex court will look into the constitutional validity of a provision in passport law and a notification providing for issuance of passport for only one year to an accused person on receipt of a 'no objection certificate' from a court.
The significance of the judgment lies not just in its protection of the right to privacy but in its insistence that no government, majoritarian or otherwise can violate the rule of law. Life is not a gift of the state but is a natural right, because it is.
The historical import of such moments is not complete without a reflection of cases past and especially when ‘ghosts’ of certain cases need to be exorcised to enable a vocabulary of non-discrimination and equality in our daily lives inside and outside of the courtroom.
Section 144 imposed outside the Supreme Court