‘All causes have martyrs,’ says respondent, disparaging petitioners’ plea on Day 7 of marriage equality hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·May 3, 2023
‘Kathal: A Jackfruit Mystery’ sits at the intersection of caste, class and gender; with a smileChhotelal Kumar and Didla Hima Bindhu·May 30, 2023
“She [Ruth Ginsburg] argued formal equality because at the time there was no other known theory of equality,”- Catharine A MacKinnonIndira Jaising·September 30, 2020
“Article 370 a mechanism through which the people of J&K could have chosen to integrate with India,” advocate Zafar Shah on Day 5Gursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 10, 2023
“Constitutions of India and J&K speak to each other through the tradition of Article 370,” Gopal Subramanium on Day 4 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 9, 2023
“Free immigration and a welfare state cannot coexist,” Vijay Hansaria on Day 2 of Section 6A hearingsSarah Thanawala·December 6, 2023
“Preamble calls for fraternity among citizens, not global fraternity,” Shyam Divan on Day 1 of Section 6A hearingsSarah Thanawala·December 5, 2023
“Protect constitutional culture and morality, not notoriously vague ‘culture’,” Indira Jaising on Day 3 of Section 6A hearingsSarah Thanawala·December 7, 2023
“The provision has become an endless beacon attracting illegal migrants to Assam,” Shyam Divan on conclusion of Section 6A hearingsSarah Thanawala·December 12, 2023
“Though the Constitution is a political document, its provisions cannot be manipulated for political ends,” argues Kapil Sibal of Day 3 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 8, 2023
“Without arrangements of autonomy, a continent-sized land of diversity like India would have collapsed,” Rajeev Dhavan on Day 6 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 16, 2023
Are anti-conversion laws antithetical to the Constitution of India?Raushan Tara Jaswal·August 16, 2023
Article 370 hearings: Did the power to abrogate Article 370 come to an end in 1957?Gursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 2, 2023
Article 370 powers perished after the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution was adopted in 1957, advocate Dinesh Dwivedi on Day 8 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 22, 2023
Article 370 was a “right loss”, through which people of J&K gained a lot, Tushar Mehta on Day 11 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 28, 2023
Article 370 was temporary only from the perspective of J&K, not India, Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 17, 2023
Article 370(3) was a fail-safe in case Article 370(1) did not function as intended for integration of J&K with India, Harish Salve on Day 13 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 1, 2023
As long as the basic structure of liberty, equality, dignity and secularism is untouched, the constitution will survive: Indira JaisingSonali Jain·September 15, 2020
Assam NRC: Supreme to hear validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act on October 17Sarah Thanawala·September 20, 2023