Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case: Constitution bench to pass further orders on Jan 29; Justice UU Lalit recuses himselfThe Leaflet·January 10, 2019
One year of Bhima-Koregaon case: Part III | One FIR, many arrests and politics of a State at war with the peopleNihalsing B Rathod·January 9, 2019
One year of Bhima-Koregaon case: Part II | Why Elgar Parishad spooked Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote, the alleged architects of January 1, 2018 anti-Dalit violenceNihalsing B Rathod·January 6, 2019
One year of Bhima-Koregaon case: Part I | History of a 200-year-old battle and why it still mattersNihalsing B Rathod·January 2, 2019
Despite pliant media, VHP-RSS meet at Ayodhya was a flop; Supreme Court mustn’t buckle under communal pressureShameem Faizee·November 29, 2018
Cannot defend the indefensible: The unconstitutional case of female genital mutilationFahad Zuberi·November 28, 2018
On Sabarimala and Ayodhya, BJP willing to court contempt of court to stoke communal firesAmulya Ganguli·October 29, 2018
Public opinion and the Ayodhya case: Breaking the myth of infallibilityPranav Tanwar & Saurabh Pandey·October 29, 2018
#Sabarimala: Dissent from the dissent of Justice Indu Malhotra: New boundaries for Article 14?Ankitesh Ojha·October 22, 2018
Is the refusal to refer Ismail Faruqui judgment to a larger bench a victory or defeat for Muslims?Fuzail Ayyubi·October 6, 2018
Babri conundrum: Ismail Faruqui verdict and the need for reconsiderationFuzail Ayyubi·September 27, 2018
Blasphemy laws remain philosophically fallacious, legally unconstitutional; so remove IPC 295A, don’t bolster itFahad Zuberi·September 25, 2018
#Section377: Bigotry disguised as religious sentiments has no place in the court of lawFahad Zuberi·September 12, 2018
Mob-lynching: Supreme Court asks errant States to file compliance reports within a weekThe Leaflet·September 7, 2018
Vague, unreasonable, constitutionally untenable: Why Indian variant of ‘blasphemy law’ – Section 295A IPC – should goKaran Kumar·August 21, 2018
Female genital mutilation must be abolished because it’s criminally liable abuse of the girl child, and hardly an ‘essential religious practice’Saunak Rajguru·August 20, 2018
Last day of Sabarimala: Rights of deity as a juristic entity are for suing and being sued: Read Indira Jaising’s additional rejoinder submissionsThe Leaflet·August 2, 2018
The ‘celibacy vs menstruation’ non-debate: Why arguments for Sabarimala temple’s ban on women are flawedMihira Sood·July 28, 2018
Sabarimala, Day 5: Lord Ayappa is a juristic person, but does Constitution favour gods over individuals?Karan Kumar·July 26, 2018