Script Changes in J&K But Nothing Dramatic to be Expected InstantlyAnuradha Bhasin Jamwal·June 23, 2021
Five-judge Supreme Court Bench to decide on petition challenging the revocation of special status of J&KThe Leaflet·July 4, 2023
De-operationalisation of Article 370 faces steep constitutional barriersMohammad Wasim·August 3, 2023
“Tomorrow if the Parliament says it is the Constituent Assembly, can it do away with the basic structure of the Indian Constitution?” ask petitioners on Day 2 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 3, 2023
“Though the Constitution is a political document, its provisions cannot be manipulated for political ends,” argues Kapil Sibal of Day 3 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 8, 2023
“Constitutions of India and J&K speak to each other through the tradition of Article 370,” Gopal Subramanium on Day 4 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 9, 2023
“Article 370 a mechanism through which the people of J&K could have chosen to integrate with India,” advocate Zafar Shah on Day 5Gursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 10, 2023
“Without arrangements of autonomy, a continent-sized land of diversity like India would have collapsed,” Rajeev Dhavan on Day 6 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 16, 2023
Article 370 was temporary only from the perspective of J&K, not India, Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 17, 2023
Article 370 powers perished after the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution was adopted in 1957, advocate Dinesh Dwivedi on Day 8 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 22, 2023
Process erasing will of people of J&K with mala fide intent can never legitimately affect Article 370, Nitya Ramakrishnan on Day 9 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 23, 2023
Psychological duality about the status of J&K was removed in 2019, Tushar Mehta on Day 10 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 24, 2023
Article 370 was a “right loss”, through which people of J&K gained a lot, Tushar Mehta on Day 11 of Article 370 hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 28, 2023
If there were no protests in Kashmir post-Article 370, it means right people had been put under arrest, Tushar Mehta jokes on Day 13 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·August 31, 2023
Article 370(3) was a fail-safe in case Article 370(1) did not function as intended for integration of J&K with India, Harish Salve on Day 13 of hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 1, 2023
After 70 years of concurrence and consultation, why retain the empty shell of Article 370? Rakesh Dwivedi on Day 14 of the hearingsGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 1, 2023
Is appearing in a court of law against state interest? It might be if you are a Kashmiri, as petitioner-in-person Zahoor Ahmad Bhat found outGursimran Kaur Bakshi·September 3, 2023