‘Farmers are important, we eat because of them. But the environment, too, has to be protected,’ SC presses for punitive measures against stubble burning

“Why don't you think of some penalty provisions? If some people are behind bars, it will send the correct message,” the Bench suggested.
‘Farmers are important, we eat because of them. But the environment, too, has to be protected,’ SC presses for punitive measures against stubble burning
Published on

THE SUPREME COURT TODAY called for a ‘carrot and stick’ approach to curb the practice of stubble burning, stressing that while farmers are important since “we eat because of them,” the environment too has to be protected.

Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, heading a bench with Justice K. Vinod Chandran, observed that “farmers are special and we are eating because of them but it does not mean that we cannot protect the environment,” while pressing for punitive measures including penalties and jail terms to deter the practice.

“Why don't you think of some penalty provisions? If some people are behind bars, it will send the correct message,” the Bench suggested.

Stubble burning involves setting fire to residual paddy straw to clear fields for the sowing of wheat. Farmers resort to this as the interval between harvesting paddy and sowing wheat is short.

The observations came during the hearing on filling vacancies in the State Pollution Control Boards of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan. The Court gave three months to fill the vacant posts.

The Punjab government told the Court that stubble burning cases had reduced in recent years—from over 17,000 incidents in 2023 to about 11,000 last year.
Loading content, please wait...
The Leaflet
theleaflet.in