Bombay HC allows Bhima Koregaon accused Hany Babu to continue treatment for post-Covid complications at Breach Candy

THE Bombay High Court on Thursday allowed Hany Babu to continue treatment at Mumbai’s Breach Candy Hospital. The court was hearing a plea filed by Hany Babu’s wife, Jenny Roweena, which sought urgent medical Bail for Babu.

The matter was heard by a bench of Justice S. S. Shinde and Justice Abhay Ahuja.

Babu, who is an associate professor at Delhi University, is accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. He had been in prison until a bench led by Justice S. J. Kathawala allowed him to move to Breach Candy Hospital for Covid-19 and Black Fungus-related treatment.

Advocate Yug Mohit Chaudhry appeared for Babu’s wife. Advocate Sandesh Patil appeared for National Investigation Agency (NIA), while APP J. P. Yagnik appears for jail authorities.

The bench noted that the hospital’s report stated that Babu was fit to be discharged. Chaudhary submitted that while Babu was fit for discharge, he needed further critical care.

Chaudhary requested the bench that while Babu was being discharged from the hospital, he should not be sent back to prison. Instead, Chaudhary prayed that Babu be placed under house arrest so that he can recover in a familiar environment.

Also Read: Bombay HC sends Ft Stan Swamy to Holy Family hospital for medical treatment; brushes aside NIA’s objection

The bench cited the stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and refused to pass an order to this effect without hearing arguments on merits.

In the course of the hearing, the bench took objection to an article written by one of Chaudhary’s colleagues in a leading newspaper. The article in question was related to Fr. Stan Swamy, another accused in the Bhima Koregoan Case, being denied medical bail.

The bench stated that writing articles on sub judice matters amounted to putting pressure on the court. The bench also questioned why Chaudhary was coming to court if he publicly stated that he had no faith in the system.

Hearing this, Chaudhary submitted that neither he nor his colleagues had ever written any articles about matters they were related with. He also informed the court that he or his colleagues do not represent Father Stan Swamy.

Chaudhary went on to say that writing articles and appearing before the court were his rights and he intended on exercising his rights. He also submitted that courts should not be sensitive to criticism.

The bench and Chaudhary had a brief argument. The bench asked Chaudhary to refrain from writing on sub judice matters like the Bhima Koregoan case, where all the accused are facing similar charges. The bench also stated that it encouraged criticism and would never infringe the right to free speech.

The court then continued hearing the matter and stated that it was unable to grant house arrest until it heard arguments on merits. Hearing this, Chaudhary asked the court to allow Babu to continue receiving treatment at Breach Candy hospital.

The court passed an order allowing Babu to continue receiving treatment at Breach Candy hospital. It also granted visiting rights to Babu’s mother, wife, and daughter.

The court posted the matter on June 15, 2021, for further hearing.

The Elgar Parishad case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at an event held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which, according to the police, triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial in the district.

The Pune police had claimed that the event was organized by members of a banned Maoist organization. The case was later taken over by the NIA.

Several other activists, including Sudha Bharadwaj, Dr. Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, and Varavara Rao, had been arrested in the case.

The Leaflet