The Leaflet

| @theleaflet_in | November 14,2018

Supreme Court of India on the administrative side on Tuesday, November 13, 2018, published a list of 105 advocates, who have applied for the “senior advocate” designation by the Supreme Court. Through a notice issued by the Secretary, Committee for Designation of Senior Advocates, Supreme Court of India, views/suggestions from stakeholders have also been solicited regarding the published names of the advocates aspiring to obtain the senior designation. Stakeholders have been requested to do the same within 15 days hence. Of 105 advocates who have sent in their applications, 15 are are women.

In 2015, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising approached the Supreme Court seeking a fair and transparent procedure for the designation of senior advocate. A two-judge bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton F Nariman in a landmark judgment on October 12, 2017  ruled that the process of designation would be dealt with by a committee, indicating a point-based format for assessment of applications. On August 6, 2018, the Supreme Court on the administrative side issued guidelines called the Supreme Court Guidelines to Regulate Conferment of Designation of Senior Advocates, 2018. This was done in compliance with the decision of the Supreme Court.

Jaising tweeted:

According to the guidelines of the Supreme Court, a Permanent Committee, Committee for Designation of Senior Advocates, shall be headed by the Chief Justice of India and shall consist of two senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, the Attorney General of India and a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association, nominated by the chairperson and members. It will also have a Permanent Secretariat.

In 2015, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising approached the Supreme Court seeking a fair and transparent procedure for the designation of senior advocate. A two-judge bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton F Nariman in a landmark judgment on October 12, 2017  ruled that the process of designation would be dealt with by a committee, indicating a point-based format for assessment of applications

As per the guidelines, the CJI or any other judge may make a recommendation in writing if they are of the opinion that an advocate deserves to be conferred with the senior designation. The Secretariat shall invite applications from retired Chief Justices and judges of the High Courts, and advocates seeking conferment of the distinction every year in the months of January and July. An Advocate-on-Record may also submit an application to the Secretariat.

The eligibility criterion for the designation is a minimum of 10 years combined standing as an advocate or a district judge, or as a judicial member of any tribunal, whose qualification for eligibility is not less than that prescribed for a district judge. Retired Chief Justices and judges are also eligible for the designation.

The application/proposal would be published in the Supreme Court website inviting suggestions and views of other stakeholder. The Committee shall scrutinise and assess as per a 100-point index. Post assessment, the candidature will be sent to the Full Court for voting. However, in case of Chief Justices and Judges of High Courts, the names shall be straightaway sent to the Full Court.

Read the notice.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Also Read

Collegium - Prey to Judges

January 18,2019

The Right to Truth

January 11,2019

Trapped in a rat-hole

January 11,2019

Free Speech in India 2018

December 31,2018

Grave systemic injustice

December 31,2018

Change of tack for Maoists

December 11,2018

Understanding Criminal Law

December 7,2018

#MeToo: A tracker

November 29,2018

Pollution: Law isn't enough

November 27,2018

Raw deal for workers

November 27,2018

After #MeToo, beyond POSH

November 13,2018

Who was Justice Holmes?

October 23,2018

In pursuit of justice

October 9,2018

Humanity deported

October 6,2018

A liberal court

October 3,2018

Ambedkar's feminism

September 18,2018

Azadi for LGBTQI communities

September 8,2018

Mother like no other

September 7,2018

Why Article 35A matters

August 15,2018

Challenges beyond 377

August 13,2018

A positive beginning

August 10,2018

WSS condemn transphobia

August 6,2018

Blame it on Collegium

August 5,2018

Scroll Up