The Leaflet

| @theleaflet_in | July 18,2018

Equating the restrictions upon menstruating women from entering the Sabarimala temple to untouchability, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising commenced arguments on behalf of intervenor Nikita Azad. Stating across the board applicability of Article 17, she drew the distinction between the right to enter and the right to carry out a ritual. She submitted that the ban on women’s entry inside the temple is based upon sex alone, and the discrimination is solely based off physiological factors. She further argued that menstruating women being categorised as a different class is unconstitutional as it lacks constitutional morality.

Jaising contended that women claim their rights under Article 25, and cited various judgments to buttress her arguments against the impugned section 3(b) of Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules 1965, such as Devaru, Charu Khurrana, Shayara Bano and Adi Saiva Sivacharigal Nala v Govt of Tamil Nadu.

Her arguments were met with remarks from the Bench, with the CJI stating that “what applies to men also applies to women”, and noting the difference between a public place of worship and one at home. Justice Chandrachud stressed upon the importance of Article 25(2)(b)’s language, and stated that discrimination may occur in absence of the impugned Rule. Justice Nariman highlighted the holding of the Devaru judgment that Article 25 and Article 26(b) need to be harmonised.

While concluding, Jaising stated that constitutional legitimacy overrides all customs.

Leave a Reply

Notify of

Also Read

Collegium - Prey to Judges

January 18,2019

The Right to Truth

January 11,2019

Trapped in a rat-hole

January 11,2019

Free Speech in India 2018

December 31,2018

Grave systemic injustice

December 31,2018

Change of tack for Maoists

December 11,2018

Understanding Criminal Law

December 7,2018

#MeToo: A tracker

November 29,2018

Pollution: Law isn't enough

November 27,2018

Raw deal for workers

November 27,2018

After #MeToo, beyond POSH

November 13,2018

Who was Justice Holmes?

October 23,2018

In pursuit of justice

October 9,2018

Humanity deported

October 6,2018

A liberal court

October 3,2018

Ambedkar's feminism

September 18,2018

Azadi for LGBTQI communities

September 8,2018

Mother like no other

September 7,2018

Why Article 35A matters

August 15,2018

Challenges beyond 377

August 13,2018

A positive beginning

August 10,2018

WSS condemn transphobia

August 6,2018

Blame it on Collegium

August 5,2018

Scroll Up