Religion

Digging a Hindu State: Eroding autonomy of the Archaeological Survey of India

Once an autonomous institution producing credible scientific, and independent research on India’s diverse, complicated history, the ASI today stands as a key instrument for the State’s revisionist agenda. If the place of worship disputes are any indication, the judiciary has been complicit in this revisionist project, relying blindly on the ASI’s compromised studies to betray its own polyvocal commitments
Representative Image Only
Representative Image Only
Swarati Sabhapandit
Published on: 

IN India, archaeological practices and conservation are regulated by a network of bureaucratic mechanisms, legal authority, and disciplinary conventions. The primary institution at the helm of these practices is the Archaeological Survey of India. 

Founded in 1861 by Alexander Cunningham, the ASI's bureaucratic framework was firmly structured into a rigid hierarchical system by Mortimer Wheeler, who became its eighth Director-General in 1944. Wheeler consolidated an  an organisational structure, and meticulously oversaw the processing and classification of artefacts and the aesthetic display of excavated sites. Although post-colonial India retained ASI’s bureaucratic structure, the nature and composition of such hierarchy gradually changed over time. 

Despite operating within a rigid bureaucratic framework, what sets ASI apart is the nature of its work, which is envisioned as a scientific endeavour focused on discovering, classifying, and characterizing archaeological sites within India’s historical narrative.
Loading content, please wait...
The Leaflet
theleaflet.in