THE Supreme Court Thursday took suo motu cognisance of the Covid19 crisis in the country..A bench led by CJI SA Bobde issued notice to the Centre on the issue of supply of oxygen; availability of essential medicines; manner and method of vaccinations and whether a court can declare a lockdown..CJI Bobde said he found that six high courts, namely Delhi, Bombay, Sikkim, Madhya Pradesh and Allahabad were are exercising their jurisdiction in the best interest of citizens, but it was creating confusion and diversion of resources.."One high court thinks there is a priority for one group and some for another", CJI Bobde said..The bench, which also had Justices L Nageshwara Rao and Ravindra Bhat, listed the matter for hearing tomorrow and appointed senior advocate Harish Salve as amicus curiae..Also Read: The need for oxygen is now, says Delhi HC; pulls up Centre for inadequate oxygen supply in the capital.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta sought to know from the court whether the Centre would need to respond to the high courts since the top court had taken suo motu cognisance. At this Justice Bhat responded by saying the Centre could present the national plan to the high courts and suo motu cognisance did not supersede any order as of now. "You can submit that plan to high courts, and as and when the need arises, we may think to withdraw the matters from the high courts"..The CJI, however, opined that may be Centre should only to report to the Supreme Court. We will, however, see it later, he said..The Supreme Court's decision came close on the heels of various high courts passing strictures against the Central Government and state governments for their failure to contain the Covid19 crisis..Also Read Health ministry instructions to reduce oxygen supply to Maharashtra unfortunate, says Bombay HC Nagpur bench; directs PRAX Air-Bhilai to continue with 110MT supply
THE Supreme Court Thursday took suo motu cognisance of the Covid19 crisis in the country..A bench led by CJI SA Bobde issued notice to the Centre on the issue of supply of oxygen; availability of essential medicines; manner and method of vaccinations and whether a court can declare a lockdown..CJI Bobde said he found that six high courts, namely Delhi, Bombay, Sikkim, Madhya Pradesh and Allahabad were are exercising their jurisdiction in the best interest of citizens, but it was creating confusion and diversion of resources.."One high court thinks there is a priority for one group and some for another", CJI Bobde said..The bench, which also had Justices L Nageshwara Rao and Ravindra Bhat, listed the matter for hearing tomorrow and appointed senior advocate Harish Salve as amicus curiae..Also Read: The need for oxygen is now, says Delhi HC; pulls up Centre for inadequate oxygen supply in the capital.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta sought to know from the court whether the Centre would need to respond to the high courts since the top court had taken suo motu cognisance. At this Justice Bhat responded by saying the Centre could present the national plan to the high courts and suo motu cognisance did not supersede any order as of now. "You can submit that plan to high courts, and as and when the need arises, we may think to withdraw the matters from the high courts"..The CJI, however, opined that may be Centre should only to report to the Supreme Court. We will, however, see it later, he said..The Supreme Court's decision came close on the heels of various high courts passing strictures against the Central Government and state governments for their failure to contain the Covid19 crisis..Also Read Health ministry instructions to reduce oxygen supply to Maharashtra unfortunate, says Bombay HC Nagpur bench; directs PRAX Air-Bhilai to continue with 110MT supply
