The Leaflet

| @theleaflet_in | December 13,2018

A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph said that the report dated January 26, 2018 submitted by Justice H S Bedi (Retd.) shall not be furnished to petitioners until further order in the Gujarat fake encounters case.

The Special Task Force, under the supervision of Justice H S Bedi (Retd.) to probed into the alleged fake encounter killings in Gujarat between 2002 and 2006 when the current Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat. The Special Task Force had investigated 24 such encounters. Justice Bedi was appointed as the chairperson of the committee on March 2, 2012 while the probe had already begun. Justice H S Bedi submitted the report on January 26, 2018.

Meanwhile, 60 witnesses in the case have turned hostile. Dinesh Gurjar, the 96th witness in the Court and also a prison cell mate of Tulsiram Prajapati, said that on December 25, 2006, Prajapati was taken by the police from Udaipur to Ahmedabad for his case hearing. Two days later they were informed that he escaped from police custody and was encountered a day later. He also said that Prajapati feared facing encounter following the encounters of Sohrabuddin Sheikh and his wife Kausar Bi in 2005.

60 witnesses in the case have turned hostile. Dinesh Gurjar, the 96th witness in the Court and also a prison cell mate of Tulsiram Prajapati, said that on December 25, 2006, Prajapati was taken by the police from Udaipur to Ahmedabad for his case hearing. Two days later they were informed that he escaped from police custody and was encountered a day later

Also, Rizwana Khan, wife of Azam Khan, a crucial witness in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh murder case, filed a petition before the Rajasthan High Court asking not to move him from Udaipur Jail to Ajmer Jail alleging threat to his life.

On the request of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s request, the Supreme Court, on December 3, 2018, allowed the Gujarat Government a period of one week to file its reply to the final report submitted by the court appointed monitoring committee of the investigation.

On December 12, 2018, the Supreme Court asked Justice Bedi (Retd.) as to whether he had shared the reports submitted to the Court with other members of the monitoring committee. The Court also directed that the report shall not be shared with the petitioners until further order. The Gujarat Government contended that the report was unilateral. The case has been adjourned and the hearing will resume after the winter vacations.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Also Read

Collegium - Prey to Judges

January 18,2019

The Right to Truth

January 11,2019

Trapped in a rat-hole

January 11,2019

Free Speech in India 2018

December 31,2018

Grave systemic injustice

December 31,2018

Change of tack for Maoists

December 11,2018

Understanding Criminal Law

December 7,2018

#MeToo: A tracker

November 29,2018

Pollution: Law isn't enough

November 27,2018

Raw deal for workers

November 27,2018

After #MeToo, beyond POSH

November 13,2018

Who was Justice Holmes?

October 23,2018

In pursuit of justice

October 9,2018

Humanity deported

October 6,2018

A liberal court

October 3,2018

Ambedkar's feminism

September 18,2018

Azadi for LGBTQI communities

September 8,2018

Mother like no other

September 7,2018

Why Article 35A matters

August 15,2018

Challenges beyond 377

August 13,2018

A positive beginning

August 10,2018

WSS condemn transphobia

August 6,2018

Blame it on Collegium

August 5,2018

Scroll Up