The Leaflet

| @theleaflet_in | September 29,2018

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising — who was a lawyer for the intervenor #HappyToBleed, a collective of young feminists fighting against menstrual taboo led by Nikita Azad —  explains the Sabarimala judgment and its far-reaching importance. Jaising talks to Advocate Nehmat Kaur of the Lawyers Collective.

Leave a Reply

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Ananth Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Who decides superstition and quackery? what amounts to superstition? Please enlighten Ms.Indira Jaisingh ji.

Also Read

Chowkidar hi chor hai

April 22,2019

The Sequence of Events

April 20,2019

April 16,2019

A Level Playing Field

April 16,2019

Why I am a Womanist

April 15,2019

Democracy and Ambedkar

April 13,2019

Fodder scam case

April 10,2019

Innocent But Damned

April 6,2019

​JNU Sedition case

April 3,2019

Star-wars club

April 2,2019

JNU Sedition Case

March 30,2019

Senior Designation in SC

March 29,2019

On the EVM Trail.

March 25,2019

Centre forms Lokpal

March 20,2019

SC issues notice to EC

March 15,2019

Rafale case update

March 14,2019

Indira Jaising writes

March 9,2019

Evidence turns to ash

March 7,2019

Supreme Court dismisses plea

February 19,2019

Sonbhadra's daughters

February 14,2019

The second-class soldiers?

February 2,2019

Scroll Up