Kritika A

| @krifritifrikafi | August 1,2018

As the arguments on the long-contested Sabarimala case concludes with the judgment being reserved, The Leaflet speaks to activist Nikita Azad, who along with Sukhjeet Singh, filed an intervention in the above-mentioned case.

In 2015, Nikita Azad addressed an open letter to Prayar Gopalakrishnan — president of the Travancore Devaswom Board — against his statement of installing scanners to ascertain menstruating women do not enter the temple. Subsequently, she launched a campaign “Happy to Bleed” which questioned menstrual taboos.

Importantly, she points out that menstruation-related taboos are not just about gender discrimination but a public health issue and restriction of access to public spaces for women. The silence around menstruation affects the health of the women. In a survey conducted by her team, it was found that 88% of the women still use cloth, ash and rags when it comes to menstrual hygiene. They still don’t have access to sanitary pads which can have an adverse implication on their health.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Also Read

In pursuit of justice

October 9,2018

Humanity deported

October 6,2018

A liberal court

October 3,2018

Ambedkar's feminism

September 18,2018

Azadi for LGBTQI communities

September 8,2018

Mother like no other

September 7,2018

Why Article 35A matters

August 15,2018

Challenges beyond 377

August 13,2018

A positive beginning

August 10,2018

WSS condemn transphobia

August 6,2018

Blame it on Collegium

August 5,2018

Scroll Up