Kritika A

| @krifritifrikafi | August 1,2018

As the arguments on the long-contested Sabarimala case concludes with the judgment being reserved, The Leaflet speaks to activist Nikita Azad, who along with Sukhjeet Singh, filed an intervention in the above-mentioned case.

In 2015, Nikita Azad addressed an open letter to Prayar Gopalakrishnan — president of the Travancore Devaswom Board — against his statement of installing scanners to ascertain menstruating women do not enter the temple. Subsequently, she launched a campaign “Happy to Bleed” which questioned menstrual taboos.

Importantly, she points out that menstruation-related taboos are not just about gender discrimination but a public health issue and restriction of access to public spaces for women. The silence around menstruation affects the health of the women. In a survey conducted by her team, it was found that 88% of the women still use cloth, ash and rags when it comes to menstrual hygiene. They still don’t have access to sanitary pads which can have an adverse implication on their health.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Also Read

A Nation for Farmers

March 20,2019

Centre forms Lokpal

March 20,2019

SC issues notice to EC

March 15,2019

Rafale case update

March 14,2019

Indira Jaising writes

March 9,2019

Evidence turns to ash

March 7,2019

Supreme Court dismisses plea

February 19,2019

Sonbhadra's daughters

February 14,2019

The second-class soldiers?

February 2,2019

Scroll Up