“Sub judice” not a ground to curtail the right to protest a parliamentary lawParas Nath Singh·October 6, 2021
A case for removal of Paragraph 4 of the Tenth Schedule to the ConstitutionNikhil Parikshith·March 4, 2022
Basic structure and unwritten constitutional principles: analysing the Canadian Supreme Court’s recent ruling in relation to the position in IndiaGaurav Thote·October 20, 2021
Can the end of debate in the Parliament end the presumption of Constitutionality too?Tanishk Goyal·October 9, 2021
Centre’s justification for Rs 8 lakh income limit for EWS reservation erases distinction between ‘general’ and ‘OBC’ categories, based on misleading claimsVineet Bhalla·October 28, 2021
Chief Election Commissioner and two Election Commissioners attending meeting convened by PMO proves Ambedkar’s fear that poll body might come under “thumb of the Executive”S.N. Sahu·December 21, 2021
Constitution Day Talk: Undermining the idea of India: Which way forward?The Leaflet·November 15, 2021
COVID-19 and Mandatory Vaccination Policies: A Fundamental Rights PerspectivePooja Shree A·July 9, 2021
Curbing protests on “sub judice” ground is contrary to legislative intent of the Constituent Assembly and the ConstitutionS.N. Sahu·October 8, 2021
Data suggests that EWS reservation scheme is unsubstantiated and baselessVineet Bhalla·October 19, 2021
Domicile reservation in the private sector is constitutionally protectedRavi Singh Chhikara and Keshav Bansal·February 14, 2022
Explainer: Why the Madras HC struck down the separate quota for Vanniyar caste in Tamil NaduParas Nath Singh·November 7, 2021
Governor’s obligations under the RTI Act, juxtaposed against judicial interpretation of Article 361 of the Indian ConstitutionShreyasi Singh·October 29, 2021